Wednesday, December 28, 2011

Stressed Chinese fight back - with pillows - Yahoo! News

SHANGHAI (Reuters) - A whirlwind of pillows bearing the names of bosses and teachers filled the air as hundreds of Chinese gathered to blow off stress in Shanghai, staging a massive pillow battle.

The annual event marked its fifth year with such a surge in interest from stressed young office workers and students that organizers held two nights of pillow fighting before Christmas Day and plan another for Dec 30.

"Nowadays there are many white collar workers and students that are facing huge pressures at work and at school, so we hope to give them an outlet to release their stress before the end of the year," said Eleven Wang, the founder and mastermind behind the epic pillow fights.

"Sometimes we have pressure on us by our bosses, teachers and exams, so today we can go crazy. Everyone will get to write onto the pillows the names of their bosses, teachers and exam subjects, and enjoy and vent to the maximum," he added.

"After releasing the stress, we can once again face our daily life with joy."

Pillows were handed out at the door as participants entered, then emotion stoked by a rock concert, with many on the floor of the huge event space rocking and waving their pillows in time to the music.

Then came the fighting.

Pillows filled the air, with many combatants opting for throwing rather than using them to whack opponents. A few hapless participants shielded their heads with as many pillows as they could hold, but most ventured eagerly in to the fray.

"I really enjoyed the fight, but my friend was useless. He joined in for two ticks and could not go on, he was afraid of getting beaten by other people," said 24-year-old Chen Yi.

"I thought it was pretty meaningful. I've just been working so much (at the office) and never get to break out in a sweat, so it felt really good."

Others gamely said they enjoyed the experience even though they ended up as attackees rather than attackers.

"I don't know who pushed me, but all of a sudden I was in the pile of pillows, where I became the target of many people, and was beaten by all sorts of people," said university student Zhu Shishan. "Very meaningful."

Interesting.

Economist Laffer Endorses Newt Gingrich

Arthur Laffer, the architect of Ronald Reagan’s economic plan, announced today that he is endorsing Newt Gingrich for president.

"Newt has the best plan for jobs and economic growth of any candidate in the field,” said Laffer, the renowned economist who is the father of The Laffer Curve and supply-side economics.

“Like Ronald Reagan’s tax cuts and pro-growth policies, Newt’s low individual and corporate tax rates, deregulation. and strong dollar monetary policies will create a boom of new investment and economic growth leading to the creation of tens of millions of new jobs over the next decade,” Laffer declared. “Plus, Newt’s record of helping Ronald Reagan pass the Kemp Roth tax cuts and enacting the largest capital gains tax cut in history as speaker of the House shows he can get this plan passed and put it into action.”

Laffer, who will join Gingrich in Storm Lake, Iowa, Thursday for a formal news conference announcing the endorsement, said, "Rebuilding the America we love requires returning to job creation and economic growth. We need big changes to fix the economy, and I am ready to stand up to Barack Obama’s class warfare rhetoric to make the case that letting the American people keep more of what they earn is the best way to create jobs.”

Laffer is the founder and chairman of Laffer Associates, an economic research firm in Nashville, Tenn., focusing on interconnecting macroeconomics, political, and demographic changes affecting global financial markets.

Interesting.

Tuesday, December 27, 2011

Pelosi's $10,000-a-Night Vacation

President Barack Obama is not the only VIP to be spending his holidays in exclusive islands in Hawaii. 

While the president and his family are on a 17-day holiday vacation in beach front homes in Kailua, Oahu, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi is spending her Christmas at the exotic Four Seasons Resort Hualalai at Historic Ka'upulehu in Kona, reports the Hawaii Reporter.

The California Democrat's suite, which she has rented for the past two Christmases, room goes for a whopping $10,000 a night. Pelosi has been escorted by local police during her two visits, at a cost of $34,000 to local taxpayers,, the Reporter says.

Pelosi reportedly spent Christmas Eve at midnight Mass in St. Michael's Catholic Church in Kailua-Kona.

The Four Seasons Resort Hualalai’s website touts the appointed grounds thusly: “Gloriously revitalised, this natural tropical paradise offers more than ever to explore — with a newly expanded Spa, beachfront dining, fashion boutiques and new Deluxe Suites, in addition to Jack Nicklaus signature golf. Set on the Big Island’s exclusive Kona-Kohala Coast, this showpiece resort captures the essence of Hawaiian design, culture and tradition.”

Pelosi has many friends in Hawaii, including Hawaii Gov. Neil Abercrombie, whom she supported during his successful campaign for governor in 2010.

Obama’s trip to the island of Oahu is much higher. Last week, the Reporter added up the total cost of his vacation to be more than $4 million.

How great.

2012 is not about Obama; it’s a Referendum on the American Idea - HUMAN EVENTS

Yes, Barack Obama brings added definition to the word disaster, as his presidency has overseen more people trapped below the poverty line than ever in modern history.

But is 2012 about defeating Obama only?

Paul Ryan doesn’t think so. The Wisconsin Republicans says that the eventual GOP nominee must make the 2012 election much broader in scope.

“[The election] is a referendum on the American idea, not on Barack Obama and his handling of the economy,” Ryan told HUMAN EVENTS. “It is, ‘Do you want to reclaim the founding principles that made us exceptional and great, an opportunity society with a circumscribed safety net? Or do you want the cradle-to-grave welfare state?’ ”

“It’s really a choice of two futures,” Ryan added. “We owe it to the country to let them choose what kind of country they want to be and what kind of people they want to be.”

(Part 4 our interview with Paul Ryan)

 

Ryan says that if the Republican challenger makes the election about the conflicting vision for America, then upon victory there would be a clear mandate to plow forward with the kind of large, structural changes that are needed to keep us free and prosperous.

“We will be better stewards of the economy than he will be,” is an insufficient campaign platform, Ryan stressed. “This is the most important election in our lifetime, no matter what generation you come from.”

Yes.

Monday, December 26, 2011

Forbes: Harry Reid Can't Find 'Job Creators'

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid is having a hard time finding job creators, according to Forbes Magazine. It’s part of a pattern, the magazine reports, in which one of the nation’s top Democrats continues to fail at locating American entrepreneurs and the jobs they help generate.

Reid “makes patently inaccurate, outrageous and bizarre claims on an important tax-policy issue without any heads being turned? I guess this is what we have come to expect of Congress. No wonder citizens with favorable opinions of Congress are as rare as unicorns, to borrow a phrase," writes Forbes contributor Paul Roderick Gregory on the magazine's website.

“Harry Reid’s statement on December 6 on his proposed 1.9 percent surtax on million-dollar incomes has kicked up some dust. Here is his statement:

“Millionaire job creators are like unicorns. They’re impossible to find, and they don’t exist… Only a tiny fraction of people making more than a million dollars, probably less than 1 percent, are small business owners. And only a tiny fraction of that tiny fraction are traditional job creators…Most of these businesses are hedge fund managers or wealthy lawyers. They don’t do much hiring and they don’t need tax breaks.”

National Public Radio parroted Reid in a recent report, saying their formidable staff of taxpayer-subsidized reporters were also unable to local a single millionaire job creator. They announced:

“NPR requested help from numerous Republican congressional offices, including House and Senate leadership. They were unable to produce a single millionaire job creator for us to interview.”

But the IRS’s Table 1.4 -- “Sources of income, adjustments, and tax size of adjusted gross income, 2009” gives this information to anybody seeking it on the Internet, Forbes found.

“There are 236,883 tax filers with incomes of a million dollars or more. By Harry Reid’s count, only one percent, or 2,361 of them, are business owners, and a tiny fraction of them create jobs. I do not know what Harry means when he says “a tiny fraction of a tiny fraction.” If we let 5 percent represent Harry’s “tiny fraction,” we are left with 118 businesses owners who earn a million or more and create jobs.”

What??

Friday, December 23, 2011

Unclaimed Space Ball Found in Namibia Undergoing Investigation | TheBlaze.com

Metal ball from the sky found in Namibia. (Photo: National Forensic Science Institute via PhysOrg)

Officials are baffled as to the origin and purpose of a 13-pound metal ball that slammed into the grassland of northern Namibia.

The ball was found in November but due to investigations, officials postponed announcing the find, according to AFP (via PhysOrg). NASA and the European Space Agency have been contacted.

AFP reports that the ball is hollow with a diameter of 14 inches and appears to be two halves welded together. The metal is reported to be an “alloy known to man” and officials have said it is not an explosive or dangerous.

Space.com reports that the impact of the ball created a crater 13 inches deep and 12.5 feet in diameter. CNN notes that the sound of explosions were reported being heard around the time the ball was found but no evidence of an actual explosion was identified. CNN goes on to state that Paul Ludik, director of the country’s National Forensic Science Institute, said no space agency has laid claim to the ball and examination is still being conducted.

AFP reports that similar balls in the past two decades have been found in southern Africa, Australia and Latin America.

Interesting.

Thursday, December 22, 2011

George H.W. Bush Backs Romney for President

Former U.S. President George H.W. Bush backs Mitt Romney for president, the Houston Chronicle reported on Thursday, an important boost for Romney from the Republican establishment less than two weeks before the Iowa caucuses.

The comments were not a formal endorsement but Bush told the newspaper he had known Romney for several years and also knew his father, former Michigan Governor George Romney.

"I think Romney is the best choice for us," Bush told the newspaper.

He cited Romney's "stability, experience, principles" and said, in a possible reference to Romney's famously volatile rival Newt Gingrich, "He's a fine person. I just think he's mature and reasonable - not a bomb thrower."

Romney, who has been a frontrunner in the race for the 2012 Republican nomination for months, is viewed as too moderate by many conservatives. He has failed to gain more than about 25 percent support in national polls as a series of rivals have surged into first place and then faded.

Gingrich pushed past Romney into first place recently, although the former speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives has faded partly due to withering attacks by Romney and his supporters.

Bush said he knew Gingrich fairly well and told the Chronicle, "I'm not his biggest advocate." The two men had a disagreement in 1990 when recession drove then-President Bush to agree to new taxes, despite having vowed not to do so. Gingrich, then a Republican House leader known for strong opinions and an outspoken style, declined to appear with the Republican president.

Bush lives in Texas but is not backing Texas Governor Rick Perry, who trails Romney in opinion polls. "I like Perry but he doesn't seem to be going anywhere; he's not surging forward," Bush said.

Perry succeeded Bush's son, George W. Bush, as Texas governor when the younger Bush became president in 2001. But Bush backed another Perry rival, U.S. Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison, over Perry in the Republican gubernatorial primary in 2010.

Bush said he could support any of the Republicans now seeking the nomination, although he expressed concern about the prospects for another Texan, the libertarian-leaning Congressman Ron Paul. Paul has moved past Gingrich in polls of Iowans likely to participate in the state's Jan. 3 nominating caucuses.

"I want to see Obama beaten," Bush told the Chronicle. "I just don't believe Ron Paul can get the nomination." (Reporting By Patricia Zengerle; Editing by Bill Trott)

Interesting.

Sunday, December 18, 2011

Liberal Iowa Newspaper Des Moines Register Backs Romney for President

Iowa's liberal-leaning newspaper, the Des Moines Register, which endorsed Barack Obama for president in 2008, has endorsed Mitt Romney for the Jan. 3 Iowa caucuses.

In giving its endorsement on Saturday, the paper cited Romney’s "sobriety, wisdom and judgment" and noted that he graduated from the Ivy League, finishing "in the top 5 percent in his MBA class at Harvard."

The Register said that, although Romney is not a Democrat, he has distinguished himself from others in the GOP field because "he offers smart and well-reasoned alternatives rather than simply proposing to swing a wrecking ball in Washington . . . His detailed policy paper on the economy contains 87 pages of carefully crafted positions on taxes, energy, trade and regulatory policy, complete with 127 footnotes."

The paper applauded Romney for his controversial healthcare program he instituted and mandated as governor of Massachusetts.

"He helped create healthcare reform in Massachusetts that is strikingly similar to the much-derided 'Obamacare,' for example. Yet Romney argues reasonably, though not entirely persuasively, that while all states should be free to experiment with their own reforms, it is wrong for the federal government to force a one-size-fits-all plan on the entire nation," the paper's editorial said.

The editorial also noted that Romney may have to overcome claims that he is a "flip-flopper," and detailed his strong stance in favor of abortion rights before and after he became governor of Massachusetts.

The editorial cited Romney's strong support of a healthcare program similar to President Barack Obama's as a key reason for the newspaper's endorsement: "While other Republican candidates are content to bash the president’s health reform law without offering meaningful reforms of their own, Romney has defended the principal goal of the Massachusetts healthcare legislation, which was to ensure that all residents there had access to healthcare."

The Romney endorsement may not be such a coup for the Republican aspirant, however. The Des Moines Register has a strong editorial history of backing President Obama and endorsed him during the 2008 presidential race.

"Obama has earned the Register's endorsement for the presidency because of his steadfastness in the face of uncertainty, his clear-eyed vision for a more just America and his potential for rallying the country to do great things," the paper's 2008 endorsement read.

Interesting.

Wednesday, December 14, 2011

Job Creators Fighting Back - HUMAN EVENTS

12/14/2011

Some politicians claim that politicians create jobs.
       
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid says, "My job is to create jobs."
       
What hubris! Government has no money of its own. All it does is take from some people and give to others. That may create some jobs, but only by leaving less money in the private sector for job creation.
       
Actually, it's worse than that. Since government commandeers scarce resources by force and doesn't have to peddle its so-called services on the market to consenting buyers, there's no feedback mechanism to indicate if those services are worth more to people than what they were forced to go without.
      
The only people who create real, sustainable jobs are in private businesses -- if they're unsubsidized.
       
Some CEOs are upset that people don't appreciate what they do. So they formed a group called the Job Creators Alliance.
       
Brad Anderson, former CEO of Best Buy, joined because he wants to counter the image of businesspeople as evil. When he was young, Anderson himself thought they were evil. But then he "stumbled into a business career" by going to work in a stereo store.
       
"I watched what happens in building a business. (My store,) The Sound of Music, which became Best Buy, was 11 years (old) before I made a dollar of profit."
       
In 36 years, he turned that store into a $50 billion company.
       
Tom Stemberg, founder of Staples, got involved with the Job Creators Alliance because he's annoyed that the government makes a tough job much tougher.
       
He complains that government mostly creates jobs -- that kill jobs.
       
"They're creating $300 million worth of jobs in the new consumer financial protection bureau," Stemberg said, "which I don't think is going to do much for productivity in America. We're creating all kinds of jobs trying to live up to Dodd-Frank ... and those jobs don't create much productivity.
       
Now, Stemberg runs a venture capital business. "I helped create over 100,000 jobs myself," he said. "Pinkberry and City Sports and J. McLaughlin are growing and adding employment."
       
To do that, he had to overcome hurdles placed in the way by government.
       
"All that we get is grief and more hoops to jump through and more forms to fill out and more regulations to comply with," complained Stemberg. "Fastest-growing investment segment in venture capitalism: compliance software,"
       
Compliance is the big word in business today. Every business has to have a compliance department. But resources are scarce, so these departments suck away creativity. It's one reason that these successful businesspeople don't think they could do today what they did in the past.
       
Mike Whalen, CEO of Heart of America Group, said he got started with loans from banks that took a chance on an unknown: "It is not an underwriting standard that can be dictated by Dodd-Frank with 55 pages. It's kind of a gut instinct."
       
But John Allison, who built BB&T Corp. into the 12th biggest bank in America, says that "gut instinct" is now illegal.
       
"It would be very difficult to do what we did then today. It was semi-venture capital thing. The government regulations (today) are so tight, including setting credit standards, particularly since the so-called financial crisis and since they ... changed the credit standards in the banking industry, making it very hard for the banks to finance small businesses."
       
These successful businessmen realize that in one way, they profit from the regulatory burden. They can absorb the costs. That gives them an advantage over smaller competitors.
       
"Somebody who wants to compete with us can't because we can afford to hire the guys that can read this stuff and to keep us in compliance with the law. They can't," Anderson said.
       
Politicians rarely understand this. One who learned it too late was Sen. George McGovern. After he left office, he started a small bed-and-breakfast and hit the regulatory wall he helped create. Later, he wrote, "I wish during the years I was in public office I had this firsthand experience about the difficulties businesspeople face. ... We are choking off business opportunity."
       
Wish they learned that before leaving office.

Interesting.

Sunday, December 11, 2011

Trump: I Represent 'Millions'

Donald Trump tells Britain's The Telegraph that he represents millions of Americans who feel Washington isn't listening to them.

In a profile published this weekend, the Telegraph asked the billionaire why almost every major Republican presidential candidate has trekked to his Trump Tower on Fifth Avenue in New York City seeking his endorsement. He responded: "It's because I represent the millions of Americans who wanted me to run and who are tired of this country getting ripped off by China and OPEC [the Organization for Petroleum Exporting Countries] and the rest of the world. We're a laughingstock — run by stupid people.”

During the interview with Philip Sherwell of The Telegraph, Trump continues: "They see me as someone who wouldn't allow this to happen. The candidates want my endorsement because those millions of Americans listen to me and respect me."

Nearly all of the candidates have gone to the real estate mogul’s office, the latest being former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, who has snagged front-runner status from former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney in many polls.

Trump, who has just published a new best-seller “Time to Get Tough: Making America # 1 Again” outlining his plan to defeat President Barack Obama in 2012, himself topped Republican presidential polls this year until he announced in May that he wouldn’t run because of conflicts with his popular “Apprentice” reality TV show franchise.

He also is slated to moderate The Newsmax ION Television 2012 Presidential Debate Dec. 27 in Des Moines, Iowa, just days before the Jan. 3 caucuses in the Hawkeye State.

“Trump has probably had more face time with the Republican field than any other American voter,” the Telegraph reports. “As well as Mr. Gingrich, Mitt Romney, Rick Perry and Michelle Bachmann have all visited Trump Tower, as did Herman Cain before dropping out of the race, and Sarah Palin, before not getting in.”

During the Telegraph interview, Trump praised both Gingrich and Romney, the two favorites, and said he intends to make an endorsement before the caucuses.

"Newt has taken off as if he's fitted with a rocket chip, but they are both my friends," he said, although he declined to tip his hand on his own favorite.

???

Thursday, December 8, 2011

Iowa Poll: Gingrich Best Prepared for President

Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich is viewed as more prepared to be president than Mitt Romney, more attuned to their concerns and just as capable of defeating President Obama, according to the latest New York Times/CBS News Poll.

The poll found that Gingrich is rated more favorably than any of the other six remaining candidates in the race among voters who say they are likely to attend the Republican caucuses in Iowa. Gingrich is also backed enthusiastically as his party’s nominee by more voters than any of his rivals, the poll found, and is leading in the head-to-head competition as the campaign here builds, according to the Times.

Gingrich holds considerable advantages over his rivals. The poll found that he is winning support from 31 percent of likely caucus goers, who rate him as the most empathetic, the strongest commander in chief and best prepared for the job by a 2-to-1 ratio. Romney had the support of 17 percent and Paul 16 percent.

Gingrich is drawing more than twice as much support as Romney among men and those who identify themselves as conservative, the Times reported. He receives three times more support than Romney from evangelical Christians. Romney receives more support from voters who call themselves moderate.

Interesting.

Wednesday, December 7, 2011

Newt Is No RINO : Personal Liberty Digest™

Newt Is No RINO
UPI
Newt Gingrich is leading the Republican pack and trying to paint himself as a conservative.

A few years ago, conservatives disappointed with the statist brand of Republicanism that was becoming ever more prevalent in Washington, D.C., developed the term “RINO” and began branding big-spending, big-government Republicans with the term. It’s an acronym for Republican In Name Only.

The term was heard often during the 2008 Republican Presidential primary campaign and was used to describe John McCain, Rudy Giuliani, Mitt Romney and others. The term was also used to describe a number of House and Senate candidates targeted by the Tea Party in the 2010 midterm elections.

But the term is a fallacy that arises from a false premise: that the Republican Party is the party of small government. The fallacy developed during the Barry Goldwater years and picked up again with Ronald Reagan. Since Reagan, the party propaganda machine has done its job well, convincing the masses of something that is not and never has been so.

Goldwater, never a darling of the Republican establishment, fought the liberal (or Rockefeller) wing of the Republican Party and tried to drive it to the right. But in truth, the Republican establishment has always been about growing government, and that’s why neither Goldwater nor Reagan was embraced by the Party elites.

In other words, the Republican Party is and always has been a statist party. Now, Newt Gingrich is leading the Republican pack and trying to paint himself as a conservative. But Gingrich is a big-government, anti-gun insider who gamed the system for millions of dollars in lobbying fees by playing the corporatist game once he left Congress. In other words, Newt is no RINO. He’s Republican through and through, just like Romney, McCain, Giuliani, George W. Bush, George H.W. Bush, Bob Dole, et al.

So Newt is no RINO. Nor is he conservative.

Yes.

Is Obama An Agent For OPEC? : Personal Liberty Digest™

We are staring into the face of $180-per-barrel oil. Under President Barack Obama, the Nation is not producing enough oil and is importing far too much of it from potential enemies. This is a reckless game engineered by the President, because oil is America’s economic lifeblood.

It recently become apparent that Obama either does not understand the danger the country is facing or, worse, is willing to ignore it because he has conspired with Arab oil exporters to give them dictatorial powers over America’s energy needs and economic future.

The United States is critically dependent on imported oil, consuming almost 10 million barrels of foreign crude every day. That is about three times more oil than the United States imported 25 years ago. With Obama’s restrictions on further oil exploration, especially offshore, the United States may import 18 million barrels per day by 2020.

Gang Green

“Gangrene” is a medical term used to describe the death of one part of the body. It happens when the blood supply is cut off to the affected area.

I witnessed gangrene overtake my dad’s legs after he underwent surgery on a bulging abdominal aorta at the Loma Linda University Medical Center many years ago.

I never studied medicine, but I have spent my lifetime studying economics. It isn’t a stretch to use the analogy that petroleum is the lifeblood to the U.S. economy.

Keystone Kops Or An Agent For Saudi Arabia?

Petroleum is essential for the United States. With so many hostile governments selling it to us, it would be easy to think that Canada would be America’s energy oasis. The two countries haven’t had so much as a skirmish in 200 years, and more than any other nation, Canada has stood shoulder to shoulder with the United States. So close are the two peoples that I can’t tell the difference between being in Montana or Alberta.

Both Nations have Judeo-Christian values and common law borne from the Magna Carta. American and Canadian men fought and died together during the two world wars.

On the surface it seems like a pretty simple equation:  Canada has 180 billion barrels of reserves, second only to Saudi Arabia, the kingpin petroleum producer and de facto leader of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries.

Canada has a democratically elected parliament. The House of Saud is a desert fiefdom run by a few dozen billionaire princes. Whereas Canada has combat troops stationed in Afghanistan killing Muslim militants, Saudi Arabia provides tens of millions of dollars to Islamic terrorists bent on killing Westerners.

Beyond this, Canada has been a rock-solid energy supplier to the United States. In fact, thousands of Americans work in the Canadian petroleum industry, and there are hundreds of U.S. corporations that have a large stake in further developing Canadian petroleum. Scores of Canadian corporations are traded on the New York Stock Exchange. Conversely, Saudi Arabia has nationalized its oil properties, and it implemented two oil embargoes against the United States in the 1970s.

It only makes sense that the United States would sign on to buy more Canadian crude. But with Obama, common sense is not at all common.

TransCanada Corporation is seeking Presidential authorization to build its $7.5 billion Keystone XL pipeline. The line would transport tar sands crude oil from Alberta through Montana, South Dakota and Nebraska on its way to refineries on the Gulf Coast.

A number of groups, comprised mostly of environmentalists and liberals, have banded together to oppose its construction. Obama is leading the crusade against Canadian crude.

The President said last month: “Because this permit decision could affect the health and safety of the American people as well as the environment, and because a number of concerns have been raised through a public process, we should take the time to ensure that all questions are properly addressed and all the potential impacts are properly understood.”

The President doesn’t seem concerned that 1,661-mile pipeline would deliver 700,000 barrels per day of crude from the oil sands to the United States.

The Hawaii Reporter recently ran this headline on an opinion piece: “Obama’s Catastrophic Pipeline Copout.”

David H. Wilkins, U.S. ambassador to Canada from 2005-2009, wrote:

The proposed Keystone XL Pipeline offers nothing but promise: tens of thousands of desperately needed jobs, and a big step toward ensuring North American energy security. But in mid-November, promise gave way to politics when President Obama punted on the pipeline permitting decision, delaying it until after the 2012 election. The Wall Street Journal called the decision a “Keystone Cop-Out.”

I call it a catastrophic cop-out, one with certain economic and diplomatic consequences. The decision on the KXL permit was expected before the end of this year and elected officials in both Canada and the United States rightly called it a “no-brainer.”

The project would reduce dependency on petroleum from the Middle East, a region that is rife with civil war. And what of the economic recovery that Obama promised three years ago? You would have to have been in a coma to see that things are no better and that, overall, the U.S. economy might be in worse shape than when he took office.

This gets me back to why the United States should be begging to sign this pipeline deal. It is estimated that the project would create a minimum of 20,000 well-paying U.S. jobs. That economic bonus would span far beyond all those families that could again have a wage earner and would spill over to every part of the economy, from Wal-Mart to mom-and-pop shops.

In fact, the pipeline deal will add more than $20 billion to the U.S. economy. An extra $5.2 billion in State property taxes would be collected.

Crude Consequences

The United States will have to deal with the consequences of turning its back on Canadian crude. First and foremost, Ottawa is building closer trade ties with Beijing with a great deal of emphasis on a possible blueprint that would deliver Alberta’s oil sands to the West Coast, where it could be delivered via tankers.

Last month, Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper met with Chinese President Hu Jintao about future Canadian oil exports to China.

Harper said: “This does underscore the necessity of Canada making sure that we are able to access Asia markets for our energy products.”

Canada is counting on China to be a key investor in Alberta’s oil sands projects and a big buyer of crude which would flow through a proposed Northern Gateway Pipeline if Canada encounters further opposition from the Obama Administration. This will make the United States all the more dependent on Arab oil. You would think Obama would understand this. The truth might be that he understands it all too well.

Yours in good times and bad,

Interesting.

Obama Administration Uses EPA to Buy Favor and Harm Cars | RedState

I’ve said before that when the Democrats propose a tax credit it’s called a “business incentive” and when a Republican proposes a tax credit it’s called a “loophole.”  This game of semantics only works because of a complicit media which is more than willing to apply the Democrat designated classifications to ensure the correct narrative.

In reality, all sides are using fancy words to avoid the one word that best describes what is happening: subsidization.

Subsidies aren’t necessarily inherently bad.  There can be subsidies that work in favor of economic growth or better opportunities for the disadvantaged.  But more often than not, subsidies are used as a way to prop up industries that serve other agendas.  Like elections for instance.

Such is the case with ethanol and specifically the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) plan to allow 15% ethanol blended with gasoline (E15) to enter the marketplace..

The ethanol industry, with the blessing of Congress and the Obama Administration, is lobbying the EPA to mandate increased ethanol usage. This would be accomplished by increasing the allowable proportion of ethanol in gasoline from 10% to 15% (E10 to E15). In addition, ethanol lobbyists are pushing the administration for fleet mandates on automakers, to require a higher percentage of flex fuel vehicles (FFVs) capable of running on ethanol blends of up to 85% (E85). (emphasis mine)

So, in an effort to win the support of “Big Corn” (which is actually pretty big), the U.S. government is going to force a product on the market that no one is asking for and actually drives up the cost of food making it even more difficult for poor people the world over to get access to the most basic of foods.

In an interview with the Financial Times, General Mills, which produces Cheerios cereal, Häagen-Dazs ice-cream and other major brands, also blamed ethanol subsidies for driving up food prices. Ken Powell the company’s chief executive said the price of corn and oats was up by 30 to 40% over last year.

“We’re driving up food prices unnecessarily,” Ken Powell, chief executive of General Mills, said in the interview. “If corn prices go up, wheat goes up. It’s all linked.”

But subsidies aren’t the only reason to reject the EPA’s plan to introduce E15.  A “Dear Colleague” letter from Rep. John Sullivan (R) and Rep. Gary Peters (R) cites a new GAO report which reveals that this blend blend would actually be a danger to current cars on the road.

From the letter:

As you know, last year EPA made a premature decision to permit E15 to be used in model year (MY) 2001 and newer vehicles.  This decision was made prior to the completion of critical vehicle testing.  Vehicles on the road today are build and warranted to withstand only up to 10% of ethanol in gasoline.  E15 not only threatens to harm vehicles but also boats, snowmobiles, and small engine equipment such as lawnmowers and snow blowers.  E15 has also demonstrated harmful effects on the environment.

Read the whole letter here.  Read the GAO report on biofuels here.

So where is the EPA getting the authorization to introduce a fuel standard which may very well be harmful to the car you’re going to be driving to work in tomorrow?  From those pesky Clean Air and Clean Water Acts which seem to grant them unlimited authority to regulate whatever they want and ignore any concerns raised by independent studies.

Reps. Sullivan and Peters have introduced amendment to HR 2584 (Department of the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2012) with the following important language:

No funds made available by this Act may be used to implement – (1) the decision of the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency entitled “Partial Grant and Partial Denial of Clean Air Act Waiver Application Submitted by Growth Energy To Increase the Allowable Ethanol Content of Gasoline to 15 Percent” published in the Federal Register on November 4, 2010 (75 Fed. Reg. 68093 et seq.); or (2) the decision of the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency entitled “Partial Grant of Clean Air Act Waiver Application Submitted by Growth Energy to Increase the Allowable Ethanol Content of Gasoline to 15 Percent” published in the Federal Register on January 26, 2011 (76 Fed. Reg. 4662 et seq.).

That’s legislative speak for “Mr. President, you can’t use any part of this to pay for your green dreams of screwing up our ‘gas guzzlers’ by recklessly introducing untested new standards just so you can send as much money as possible from the tax payer to voting blocks in corn states.  Now stop screwing around in the market and figure out how to get your lame Democrat colleagues in the Congress to propose a budget for once in the 950+ since you took office you gigantic screw-up.”

Or something like that.

Uhoh

Monday, December 5, 2011

Some Atheist Scientists Bring Their Children to Church | TheBlaze.com

Atheist scientists may have no faith in the almighty, but that hasn’t stopped some of them from trying to enjoy the fringe benefits the faithful receive.

In a new survey that examines the activities of college faculty in the natural and social sciences, 17 percent of non-believers who have children said that they attended religious services more than one time in the past year.

But it doesn’t end there. These atheist scientists also want their kids to know more about the world’s many religions so that they will be able to make informed decisions about their personal beliefs. This is particularly striking, considering that many non-believers try to shield their children from believing in faith and religion.

Elaine Howard Ecklund of Rice University, the researcher behind the new study, says that scientists, who have a natural liking for exploring all potential options, may actually want to give their children a fair-minded opportunity to explore their personal views on faith.

One of the survey participants says he was raised in a Catholic home. While he later decided that science and religion aren’t compatible, he has decided to expose his daughter to various religious traditions. ”I … don’t indoctrinate her that she should believe in God,” he explained. “I don’t indoctrinate her into not believing in God.”

“Our research shows just how tightly linked religion and family are in U.S. society — so much so that even some of society’s least religious people find religion to be important in their private lives,” Ecklund explains. ”We thought that these individuals might be less inclined to introduce their children to religious traditions, but we found the exact opposite to be true,” she continued.

Live Science adds:

The atheist parents surveyed had multiple reasons for attending religious services in the absence of religious belief. Some said their spouse or partner was religious, and encouraged them to go to services as well. Others said they enjoyed the community that attending a church, mosque, temple or other religious institution can bring.

The survey data was collected via interviews with 275 participants (part of a wider 2,198-person survey of faculty at 21 U.S. research universities).

Interesting.

Gingrich Praises Newsmax, ION TV for Hosting Debate

Presidential hopeful Newt Gingrich gave his full backing to the Newsmax ION Television GOP debate today, saying that the Dec. 27 event will provide the last chance for voters to assess the candidates before primary season polling starts.

Standing alongside debate host Donald Trump, Gingrich said, “We have to be open to new ways of doing things and new ways of approaching things.”

Gingrich then praised Trump and Newsmax, adding, “I thought it was great when [Donald Trump] agreed to do it. I think it’s great that Newsmax is helping launch it.”

Story continues below video.


“It’s part to the process by which America governs itself,” the former House speaker said.

The debate, which will be available in 99 million homes throughout America on the ION Television network, will begin at 8 p.m. on Dec. 27, just seven days before caucusgoers in Iowa pick their candidate for the Republican nomination. It also will be streamed at Newsmax.com.

Note: Sign Up to RSVP to Join Donald Trump for the Newsmax ION Television Presidential Debate — Click Here Now!

“This is a country that elected a peanut farmer to the presidency,” Gingrich said, referring to Jimmy Carter. “It elected an actor who made two movies with a chimpanzee to the presidency,” he added, in reference to Carter’s successor, Ronald Reagan.

“This is a country with enormously wide open talent. Donald Trump is a great showman and also a great businessman.”

Gingrich had just left a near hour-long face-to-face meeting with Trump in New York. He follows a slew of others who are, or have been in the race, who have met the property developer. They include Mitt Romney, Rick Perry, Herman Cain, Michele Bachmann, and Sarah Palin.

When asked why he was taking time away from the campaign trail to meet Trump, Gingrich said, “Why wouldn’t you?”

“I want to pick up on something Herman Cain said a while back. Sometimes, we have to get a certain sense of humor in politics.” He called Trump “a genuine American icon in his own right.”

“If we are trying to figure out how to create jobs, one of the differences between my party and the other party is we actually go to people who know how to create jobs to figure out how to create jobs.”

The invitations were sent out to the candidates on Friday. Trump has said he will endorse one of them sometime after the big event.

Yes.

Sunday, December 4, 2011

Former CNN Chief Heads Up Newsmax ION Debate

A prestigious team of some of the top producers in network and cable television news -- including the former head of CNN's news division -- has been assembled to produce The Newsmax ION Television 2012 Presidential Debate to be moderated by businessman Donald J. Trump.

Newsmax Media and ION Television announced the production team, which collectively has more than a century of experience in managing major network coverage of U.S. presidential debates and elections, on Sunday.

"ION, Newsmax and Mr. Trump are committed to host a serious presidential forum which will include some of the most reputable journalists and media people in the nation," Brandon Burgess, CEO and Chairman of ION Television, said.

Sign Up to Join Donald Trump's Newsmax ION TV Debate -- Click Here Now.

The ION Television network reaches more than 99 million U.S. homes. During prime time, ION typically has more viewers than any major cable news channel in the key demographic 25-54 group.

The debate will be also streamed at Newsmax.com. Newsmax is the nation's leading conservative online media publisher reaching more than 10 million readers monthly.

"With Donald Trump and the top-notch media and production team led by Eason Jordan we have organized, we expect the The Newsmax ION 2012 Presidential Debate will have the largest audience of any Republican primary debate to date," Newsmax CEO Christopher Ruddy said.

On Sunday, Newsmax and ION Television announced several key staff for their debate:

  • Eason Jordan, Executive Producer — Jordan worked for 23 years with CNN, where he served as chief news executive and president of news gathering and international networks. Jordan's journalistic honors include Emmy Awards, Peabody Awards  Edward R. Murrow Awards, Headliner Awards, ACE Awards, the Robert F. Kennedy Journalism Award, the Vanguard Award, and the Livingston Award. He is the founder and CEO of Poll Position, a news, polling, and social media company. He is also a member of the Council of Foreign Relations.
  • John Reade, Senior Producer — A CBS News veteran, he produced CBS News's big event coverage and programs from 1996-2009 including two 2008 presidential debates. Reade is expert at producing and covering election nights, political debates and political conventions. He also produced the TV coverage of the 1988 vice presidential debate and the 1992 presidential debate, He is a four-time Emmy winner.
  • Larry Register, Media Coordinator — Register is a five-time Emmy-winning media special projects expert who has worked for more than three decades with CNN, NBC News, and other news organizations. At CNN, he served as the vice president for special projects, Jerusalem bureau chief, and executive producer. He worked as a producer at NBC News before helping build and launch TV news networks in India and Bangladesh. He now is the senior editor at Poll Position.
  • Earl Maple, Director — An award-winning director of TV news programs and special events, Maple served as CNN's senior director 1980-2003 during which he directed CNN's coverage of political debates, political conventions, and election nights. His live debate experience included directing the telecast of the 1996 debate between Bill Clinton and Bob Dole, as well as the vice presidential debate that year between Al Gore and Jack Kemp. After leaving CNN, he served for years as the director of SEC college football game telecasts.
The Newsmax ION Television media team will be organizing the live debate event set for Dec. 27, 2011 in Des Moines Iowa -- the last major debate before the Iowa Caucus.

The invitations to the debate were just sent out Friday afternoon and already both former House Speaker Newt Gingrich and former U.S. Sen. Rick Santorum have officially accepted.

Interesting.

Saturday, December 3, 2011

Trump Tells Van Susteren Newsmax, ION TV Debate Will Shine

It did not take long for reaction to flood in concerning Donald Trump's accepting an invitation by Newsmax and ION TV to moderate a Republican presidential debate Dec. 27.

Fox News' Greta Van Susteren was the first to grill Trump about the debate in an interview on her show.

Note: Sign up to RSVP to Join Donald Trump for the Debate -- Click Here Now!

When asked why he agreed to do it, Trump said: "I got a call from the people at Newsmax, which is a great group, and the ION folks -- who I guess they reach 100 million people, a very large television network. And they came to see me and asked whether or not I'd be willing to do it. And it is a little bit of a change and a little bit of something different for me. And I said, yes,  I would do it. I want to see what's going on. I mean, we want to get  the right person in there. There's no question about that. So I agreed
to do it."

Trump bristled a little when Van Susteren asked about the debate format.

"I really think we should stop with the formalities. I watch the different moderators get up and explain what the debate is about. It's a waste of time. A debate is a debate." he explained.

"We'll have a debate on the issues. We'll be talking about things like, as an example, OPEC, where nobody is talking about OPEC at the debates, or very little. China. India, other countries that are just taking our lunch right out of our mouths...

"So we'll be talking about very important issues and talking about social issues and environmental issues maybe to a lesser extent, but we'll be talking about environmental issues and talking about lots of different things."

Trump added: "This is a serious debate. Some said, this will be 'The Apprentice.' The fact is this is a serious debate, and a  lot of people will be watching."

Concerning the decision by former Utah Governor Jon Huntsman to sit out the debate, Trump replied, "He has no chance of winning anyway so that's good because we can have more time for the people who are serious candidates."

"I think it would get high ratings and we have some very serious questions," Trump added.

Regarding Huntsman's decision to not take part in the debate, his campaign said Republicans deserve a "serious discussion of the issues."

Meanwhile, Forbes reports Huntsman's campaign told the Business Insider they look forward to watching "Mitt and Newt suck up to the Donald," adding that Huntsman not taking part shows he's the only adult in the Republican presidential campaign.

The Washington Post's Ezra Klein says this "raises the question of what other reality show hosts could be running Republican debates."

Trump also said during the Fox interview he would not be making any candidate endorsements prior to the debate.

He added that former House Speaker Newt Gingrich has a meeting with him on Monday, but he emphasized he would only make an endorsement "sometime after the debate."

Interesting.

Friday, December 2, 2011

Bachmann: Gingrich, Romney Inconsistent Conservatives

With little more than a month to go before the Iowa Caucuses, presidential hopeful Michele Bachmann took off the gloves  against her two main GOP rivals in an exclusive interview with Newsmax.TV.

The Minnesota congresswoman accuses former House speaker Newt Gingrich of being too tied to special interests, while she says that former Mass. Gov. Mitt Romney is not a real conservative.

And neither man has stood true to a set of core convictions, emphasizes Bachmann, whose new book is entitled, “Core of Conviction: My Story.”

“I don’t sell myself for influence,” insists Bachmann, adding that the location of Gingrich’s Washington, D.C. office on K Street is the epitome of establishment politics.

“He has an organization that’s taken in well over $100 million to have influence on behalf of special interests in Washington, D.C. Isn’t that exactly what we’re trying to get away from: crony capitalism?

"That’s what I’ve been fighting when I’ve been in Washington. And that’s the real juxtaposition. It’s one thing to present yourself as a conservative. It’s another thing to be a conservative. I am a conservative.”

Story continues below the video.



She urges voters to take a closer look at Romney’s record as governor in deciding whether he has been true to conservative ideals, most notably on the issues of healthcare, abortion and same-sex marriage.

“He is the governor that put in place the precursor to Obamacare — socialized medicine for Massachusetts,” says Bachmann. “He also has been an advocate for abortion. Now he’s saying that he’s pro-life and he’s also been an advocate for same-sex marriage. He signed 189 same-sex marriage licenses as governor. But that just begins to scratch the surface of his policies.”

Bachmann also points to Romney’s support of the TARP bailout as well as his support for costly global warming initiatives that she believes will increase the price of energy.

In the end, voters must decide whether Romney is a true conservative.

“Voters will make that decision, but clearly that doesn’t sound like a conservative,” she says. “And I think that’s another reason why voters are going to come home and see that I am their champion.”

In contrast, she says that she has remained steadfast in her opposition to Obamacare and has stood firm on other conservative issues.

“I was bringing 40,000 Americans to Washington to fight Obamacare and they were advancing it,” she says. “I think when people take a look at where we’re at in the issues, they’ll come back to the core conservative in this race and that’s me.”

Bachmann says she's the only consistent conservative.

“I’ve been consistent. It hasn’t always been politically correct, but I haven’t deviated based on political expediency. I fight and I stand true to principle,” says Bachmann, “And wouldn’t that be refreshing to have somebody in the White House who we know we can count on, who is going to do what they say and say what they mean.”

Bachmann declined to offer advice to Herman Cain as he continued to reassess the future of his embattled presidential campaign. “I like Herman Cain,” she says. “He has a fabulous personality and he’ll have to make that decision.”

She also took a jab at the media, and NBC in particular, for her treatment as a guest on Jimmy Fallon’s "Late Night," when the band welcomed her with an off-color song, and also for an implication that she didn’t know the United States had closed its embassy in Iran more than three decades ago.

“I know that there is not an American embassy in Iran,” counters Bachmann, who sits on the House Intelligence Committee. “They were trying to suggest that I didn’t know that, and that’s false. It’s just another NBC attack and unfortunately NBC has been a very willing partner to lift up the Obama administration and tear down any Republican rivals. And I just think it’s time to stop. This kind of media bias is just over the top.”

In general, she says, the media has demonstrated a bias against conservative women.

“Had that been Michelle Obama who had come out on stage rather than Michele Bachmann I think the president of NBC would have come crawling and begging forgiveness from Michelle Obama and would have issued an apology. I never heard from the president of NBC. I got a senior vice president. And as far as I’m concerned, that’s fine. I’ve put it to bed. It’s just the idea that, why is it okay to do this to conservative women but not to liberal women? I just think that it doesn’t matter what your politics are you shouldn’t demean women.”

While Egypt is still awaiting the results of its first election since the February revolution, Bachmann maintains that the policies of President Obama are partly to blame if that country falls under the rule of the Muslim Brotherhood, a moderate Islamist movement banned for decades by Hosni Mubarak.

“President Obama has helped to radicalize and bring to power Muslim Brotherhood elements. That’s not good for the United States. They are radical and it doesn’t do any good to have a radical organization be more empowered than they were before,” she explains. “This bodes very ill for the best interests of Israel, our greatest ally in the world, and for the United States as well.

“President Obama has a lot to answer for. He’s been a disaster on foreign policy. He’s weakened the United States and he’s put us in a position where our citizens can be far more vulnerable, even potentially to nuclear attacks.”

Bachmann says that she has the most current experience with respect to national security matters than any other GOP candidate based on her position on the Intelligence Committee.

“We’re living in a very dangerous world and this election will be about jobs and the economy but I will tell you my greatest concern right now is with the radicalization of Islamist jihadists,” she says. “That’s my worry, and from day one I will be prepared as president because make no mistake about it, the next president of the United States will be tested almost immediately. I’m prepared to meet that test.”

She lays claim to one other qualification that none of her male rivals possess.

“I think it’s time to have a mom in the White House and one that has a backbone made out of titanium who’s tough as nails and who will bring this economy back around and also hold other nations to account,” she says. “I’ll do that as president of the United States.”

Hmmm.

Thursday, December 1, 2011

Barbour: Obama Will Lose Most of the Country in 2012

Mississippi Gov. and longtime Republican power broker Haley Barbour tells Newsmax that the 2012 presidential election will be the most important White House race of his lifetime because “people are really worried about the country’s future.”

He also calls President Barack Obama’s tax policies “nonsensical” and predicts that, if the 2012 election is a referendum on Obama, he will lose “most everywhere in the country.”

Barbour was chairman of the Republican National Committee from 1993 to 1997 and is the former chairman of the Republican Governors Association. He was elected governor of Mississippi in 2003 and will be leaving office at the end of his current term because of term limits.

In an exclusive interview with Newsmax.TV at the governors association gathering in Orlando, Fla., on Thursday, Barbour was asked about his assertion that 2012 will be a watershed year in American politics.

Story continues below the video.

Gov. Haley Barbour explains why he calls 2012 a watershed year for our country. In this Newsmax.TV video, the Mississippi Republican applauds successes of the new GOP governors and derides President Barack Obama for punishing job creators and then expecting those job creators to create new jobs.


“This is the highest-stakes presidential election of my lifetime,” Barbour declares.

“This is my 12th presidential campaign, and the stakes have never been this high before. I’ve never heard people actually say I’m afraid my children and grandchildren are not going to inherit the same country I inherited. But today I hear that all the time.

“People are really worried about the country’s future. They know that we need a big shift back in the right direction, that our country is way off on the wrong track.

“The policies of this administration are making our economy worse, making it harder to create jobs. It may be good for Wall Street, but it’s terrible for Main Street. And so this is really an important election.”

Looking ahead at that election, Barbour says: “I think any Republican who gets the nomination will carry the South and perhaps sweep the South.”

Obama won Florida, Virginia, and North Carolina in 2008, but “I don’t see that happening again,” he adds.

“Ohio could be the state that controls the election, and Obama is not popular there.

“How do you say, as Obama does, that he wants a 1 or 2 trillion-dollar tax increase that would fall primarily on job creators, and then expect those job creators to create more jobs? If you think it’s nonsensical, it is.

“That’s his problem in Ohio. If the election is a referendum on Obama, he won’t just lose Ohio, he’ll lose most everywhere in the country.”

In November, Mississippi voters rejected a ballot initiative that in effect would have banned abortion. Barbour says it failed because supporters “went about it the wrong way. First of all, the Legislature would have passed it. But it got beat pretty badly because about half of pro-life people voted against it.

“The reason they voted against it was because it was put on the ballot not to say life begins at conception, period, but at fertilization. That made a lot of people very concerned about in vitro fertilization, which has been a blessing for a lot of people in this country.

“I hoped they’ve learned their lesson. My successor as governor has told them, let’s take it up in the Legislature.”

Barbour complains that unfunded mandates from the federal government are severely impacting his state and others by requiring spending increases.

When federal officials "take over regulation, they don’t do it well,” he tells Newsmax. “A lot of people say Republicans are against regulation. I’m not against regulation, I’m against bad regulation.

“There are a lot of things that need to be regulated by the government, appropriately, but the best place is at the state level.

“My department of environmental quality understands their job is to help us create jobs in Mississippi in an environmentally appropriate way. The federal government’s idea is that their job is to stop things from happening. No risk is too small and no cost is too high for the federal government to say you can’t do it this way, you can’t do it that way.”

One example of federal intrusion in the states is Obamacare, which Barbour says will “increase Medicaid rolls by two-thirds and increase Medicaid spending by more than that much, because when they announce what the mandates are going to be, what has to be covered, it’s going to drive up the cost of our Medicaid program.

“We have a lot of people on Medicaid and they get good care, but we don’t offer Cadillac plans that the federal government will require.”

Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker is facing recall because of his policies regarding public employee unions. Opponents claim the dispute is over collective-bargaining rights, but “there is no right to collective bargaining,” Barbour asserts. “Federal employees don’t have collective bargaining. Many states don’t have collective bargaining. This idea that this is some kind of constitutional right simply is not true.

“Many Democrats understand that allowing public employee union to strike is simply not acceptable if we’re going to have the kind of government we expect in the United States.”

Barbour also says that, if the recall is successful, it won’t scare off other governors from taking on public employee unions because in some states they will have to rein in the unions if they are to get their budgets under control.

“The taxpayers have been paying in gigantic amounts of money and they deserve this to be a reasonable program that taxpayers can afford.”

Hmmm